Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorReed, Mara H.
Authordc.contributor.authorMuñoz Sáez, Carolina
Authordc.contributor.authorHajimirza, Sahand
Authordc.contributor.authorWu, Sin-Mei
Authordc.contributor.authorBarth, Anna
Authordc.contributor.authorGirona, Társilo
Authordc.contributor.authorRasht Behesht, Majid
Authordc.contributor.authorWhite, Erin B.
Authordc.contributor.authorKarplus, Marianne S.
Authordc.contributor.authorHurwitz, Shaul
Authordc.contributor.authorManga, Michael
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T18:07:13Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-03-04T18:07:13Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPNAS 2021 Vol. 118 No. 2 e2020943118es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1073/pnas.2020943118
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/184053
Abstractdc.description.abstractSteamboat Geyser in Yellowstone National Park’s Norris Geyser Basin began a prolific sequence of eruptions in March 2018 after 34 y of sporadic activity. We analyze a wide range of datasets to explore triggering mechanisms for Steamboat’s reactivation and controls on eruption intervals and height. Prior to Steamboat’s renewed activity, Norris Geyser Basin experienced uplift, a slight increase in radiant temperature, and increased regional seismicity, which may indicate that magmatic processes promoted reactivation. However, because the geothermal reservoir temperature did not change, no other dormant geysers became active, and previous periods with greater seismic moment release did not reawaken Steamboat, the reason for reactivation remains ambiguous. Eruption intervals since 2018 (3.16 to 35.45 d) modulate seasonally, with shorter intervals in the summer. Abnormally long intervals coincide with weakening of a shallow seismic source in the geyser basin’s hydrothermal system. We find no relation between interval and erupted volume, implying unsteady heat and mass discharge. Finally, using data from geysers worldwide, we find a correlation between eruption height and inferred depth to the shallow reservoir supplying water to eruptions. Steamboat is taller because water is stored deeper there than at other geysers, and, hence, more energy is available to power the eruptions.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) EAR1135452 EAR1724986es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherNatl Acad Scienceses_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectYellowstonees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSteamboates_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGeyseres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHydrothermales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSeasonailityes_ES
Títulodc.titleThe 2018 reawakening and eruption dynamics of Steamboat Geyser, the world’s tallest active geyseres_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States