Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBurgos Mellado, Claudio
Authordc.contributor.authorDonoso, Felipe
Authordc.contributor.authorDragicevic, Tomislav
Authordc.contributor.authorCárdenas Dobson, Jesús Roberto Pedro Alejandro
Authordc.contributor.authorWheeler, Patrick
Authordc.contributor.authorClare, Jon
Authordc.contributor.authorWatson, Alan
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2023-01-04T15:31:11Z
Available datedc.date.available2023-01-04T15:31:11Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2022
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on power electronics Volume 37 Issue 7 Page 8488-8501 Jul 2022es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1109/TPEL.2022.3147466
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/191316
Abstractdc.description.abstractDistributed control of modular multilevel converter (MMC) submodules (SMs) offers several potential benefits such as flexibility, scalability, and modularity. In this approach, low-level control tasks, such as capacitor voltage balancing, can be distributed amongst controllers placed in the SMs. This decreases the computational burden for the central control system that performs high-level control tasks; also, a single point of failure is avoided. Distributed control architecture requires a cyber-physical network (CFN) through which local controllers share all the information necessary to perform their respective control loops. To date, none of the reported works in this field have paid attention to potential imperfections in the CFN. Indeed, previous works are based on the assumption that the network always provides correct information to the local controllers. However, erroneous measurements in the CFN may degrade the distributed control scheme operation, leading to suboptimal or even unstable operation. These events can occur in the presence of cyberattacks, for example, which can be created through illegitimate data intrusion into the distributed control architectures. This article is the first to investigate the impacts of cyberattacks on distributed control schemes used in MMCs. The effects of a specific cyberattack, named false data injection attack (FDIA), on a consensus-based distributed control strategy are studied in this article. Additionally, a method for detecting FDIAs is proposed, along with a countermeasure strategy, to ensure the safe operation of the MMC, while the attack is cleared. The proposals reported in this article are validated using simulation and experimental results.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipAgencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) ANID/FONDECYT Iniciacion/11220989 ANID/FONDECYT Regular/1180879 ANIDBasal Project FB0008es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherIEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineerses_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceIEEE Transactions on power electronicses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDecentralized controles_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCapacitorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVoltage controles_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFalse data injection attack (FDIA)es_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectKalman filteres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectModular multilevel converters (MMCs)es_ES
Títulodc.titleCyber-attacks in modular multilevel converterses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States