Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorEbensperger, Luis A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSobrero, Raúl es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorQuirici, Verónica es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorCastro, Rodrigo A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorOrtiz Tolhuysen, Liliana es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorVargas, Francisco es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorBurger, Joseph Robert es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorQuispe, René es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorVillavicencio, Camila P. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorVásquez Salfate, Rodrigo es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorHayes, Loren D. es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2012-05-31T15:52:56Z
Available datedc.date.available2012-05-31T15:52:56Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2012
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBehav Ecol Sociobiol (2012) 66:261–274es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI 10.1007/s00265-011-1274-3
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/120052
Abstractdc.description.abstractIntraspecific variation in sociality is thought to reflect a trade-off between current fitness benefits and costs that emerge from individuals' decision to join or leave groups. Since those benefits and costs may be influenced by ecological conditions, ecological variation remains a major, ultimate cause of intraspecific variation in sociality. Intraspecific comparisons of mammalian sociality across populations facing different environmental conditions have not provided a consistent relationship between ecological variation and group-living. Thus, we studied two populations of the communally rearing rodent Octodon degus to determine how co-variation between sociality and ecology supports alternative ecological causes of group living. In particular, we examined how variables linked to predation risk, thermal conditions, burrowing costs, and food availability predicted temporal and population variation in sociality. Our study revealed population and temporal variation in total group size and group composition that covaried with population and yearly differences in ecology. In particular, predation risk and burrowing costs are supported as drivers of this social variation in degus. Thermal differences, food quantity and quality were not significant predictors of social group size. In contrast to between populations, social variation within populations was largely uncoupled from ecological differences.es_CL
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFunding was provided by FONDECYT grant #1060499 to LAE by National Science Foundation grants #0553910 and #0853719 and Louisiana Board of Regents Research and Development grant (LEQSF 2007-09- RD-A-39) to LDH and by the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (grants ICM-P05-002, and PBF-23-CONICYT-Chile) to RAV. Other funding sources were the Program 1 of Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ecología and Biodiversidad (FONDAP 1501–001), the American Society of Mammalogists, and Sigma Xi. RS was funded by a scholarship from CONICYT (Chilean Government). This study was approved by the ULM Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee and adhered to U.S. and Chilean laws (permit 1-58/2005 [2711] by the Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_CL
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_CL
Keywordsdc.subjectSocialityes_CL
Títulodc.titleEcological drivers of group living in two populations of the communally rearing rodent, Octodon deguses_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record