Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGarcía Verdugo, Ricardo Rogelio
Authordc.contributor.authorZamorano, Franciscoes_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorAboitiz Domínguez, Francisco Javieres_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2014-12-30T13:31:25Z
Available datedc.date.available2014-12-30T13:31:25Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience August 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 605en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00605
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/123253
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe capacity for language is arguably the most remarkable innovation of the human brain. A relatively recent interpretation prescribes that part of the language-related circuits were co-opted from circuitry involved in hand control—the mirror neuron system (MNS), involved both in the perception and in the execution of voluntary grasping actions. A less radical view is that in early humans, communication was opportunistic and multimodal, using signs, vocalizations or whatever means available to transmit social information. However, one point that is not yet clear under either perspective is how learned communication acquired a semantic property thereby allowing us to name objects and eventually describe our surrounding environment. Here we suggest a scenario involving both manual gestures and learned vocalizations that led to the development of a primitive form of conventionalized reference. This proposal is based on comparative evidence gathered from other species and on neurolinguistic evidence in humans, which points to a crucial role for vocal learning in the early development of language. Firstly, the capacity to direct the attention of others to a common object may have been crucial for developing a consensual referential system. Pointing, which is a ritualized grasping gesture, may have been crucial to this end. Vocalizations also served to generate joint attention among conversants, especially when combined with gaze direction. Another contributing element was the development of pantomimic actions resembling events or animals. In conjunction with this mimicry, the development of plastic neural circuits that support complex, learned vocalizations was probably a significant factor in the evolution of conventionalized semantics in our species. Thus, vocal imitations of sounds, as in onomatopoeias (words whose sound resembles their meaning), are possibly supported by mirror system circuits, and may have been relevant in the acquisition of early meanings.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Millenium Center for the Neuroscience of Memory, Chile, NC10-001-F, which is developed with funds from the Innovation for Competitivity from the Ministry for Economics, Fomentation and Tourism, Chile and by Fondecyt Grant No 1110525.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherFontiersen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectImitationen_US
Títulodc.titleFrom imitation to meaning: circuit plasticity and the acquisition of a conventionalized semanticsen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile