Strategies to assess the validity of recommendations: a study protocol
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez García, Laura
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sanabria, Andrea Juliana
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Araya Cabello, Ignacio
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lawson, Jennifer
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Haynes, R. Brian
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rigau, David
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Solà, Iván
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Díaz del Campo, Patra
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Estrada, Maria Dolors
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
García Álvarez, Elvira
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gracia, Javier
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kotzeva, Anna
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Louro González, Arturo
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Salcedo Fernandez, Flavia
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Trujillo Martín, María Mar
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alonso Coello, Pablo
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-02-12T20:41:56Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-02-12T20:41:56Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Martínez García et al. Implementation Science 2013, 8:94
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-94
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/123525
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) become quickly outdated and require a periodic reassessment of
evidence research to maintain their validity. However, there is little research about this topic. Our project will provide
evidence for some of the most pressing questions in this field: 1) what is the average time for recommendations to
become out of date?; 2) what is the comparative performance of two restricted search strategies to evaluate the need to
update recommendations?; and 3) what is the feasibility of a more regular monitoring and updating strategy compared
to usual practice?. In this protocol we will focus on questions one and two.
Methods: The CPG Development Programme of the Spanish Ministry of Health developed 14 CPGs between 2008 and
2009. We will stratify guidelines by topic and by publication year, and include one CPG by strata.
We will develop a strategy to assess the validity of CPG recommendations, which includes a baseline survey of clinical
experts, an update of the original exhaustive literature searches, the identification of key references (reference that
trigger a potential recommendation update), and the assessment of the potential changes in each recommendation.
We will run two alternative search strategies to efficiently identify important new evidence: 1) PLUS search based in
McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) database; and 2) a Restrictive Search (ReSe) based on the least number of
MeSH terms and free text words needed to locate all the references of each original recommendation.
We will perform a survival analysis of recommendations using the Kaplan-Meier method and we will use the log-rank
test to analyse differences between survival curves according to the topic, the purpose, the strength of
recommendations and the turnover. We will retrieve key references from the exhaustive search and evaluate their
presence in the PLUS and ReSe search results.
Discussion: Our project, using a highly structured and transparent methodology, will provide guidance of when
recommendations are likely to be at risk of being out of date. We will also assess two novel restrictive search strategies
which could reduce the workload without compromising rigour when CPGs developers check for the need of updating.