Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2013Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Mercado, Alejandro
Cómo citar
Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study
Author
Abstract
The conventional technique for percutaneous
nephrolithotomy (PNL) ends by placing a nephrostomy tube
within the access tract. However, feasibility and safety of
tubeless PNL have been widely demonstrated. In this
modification, a ureteral stent is usually left in place instead
of the nephrostomy tube. The aim of this study is to compare
the use of a postoperative indwelling double-J stent
versus an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter in
patients undergoing tubeless PNL. Sixty-eight patients
undergoing tubeless PNL were randomized either for a
postoperative double-J stent (group 1) or for an overnightexternalized
ureteral catheter (group 2). Outcomes evaluated
included postoperative pain, hospital stay length,
incidence of hemorrhagic complications, residual lithiasis
and urinary leakage. Groups were similar according to age,
sex, body mass index and stone burden. There were no
significant differences in terms of postoperative pain, incidence
of perirenal hematomas, residual lithiasis and urinary
leakage. However, patients in group 1 presented longer
hospital stays (3.7 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 days; p\0.001)
and greater hematocrit drops (4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 %;
p\0.001). Our results confirm that among patients
undergoing tubeless PNL, both alternatives (i.e. leaving a
double-J stent or an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter)
are reliable and safe. However, further considerations,
like the need of double-J stent removal under cystoscopy,
need to be taken into account when deciding which
modality to use.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Quote Item
Urolithiasis (2013) 41:253–256
Collections