Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorParisi, M. Gabriela 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarraro, Giovanni es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorMaris, Michele es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorBrunini, Adrian es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2010-01-12T12:59:33Z
Available datedc.date.available2010-01-12T12:59:33Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2008
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationAstronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 482, Issue 2, pp.657-664, 2008en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0004-6361
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/125081
Abstractdc.description.abstractContext. It is widely accepted that the large obliquity of Uranus is the result of a great tangential collision (GC) with an Earth size proto-planet at the end of the accretion process. The impulse imparted by the GC had affected the Uranian satellite system. Very recently, nine irregular satellites (irregulars) have been discovered around Uranus. Their orbital and physical properties, in particular those of the irregular Prospero, set constraints on the GC scenario. Aims. We attempt to set constraints on the GC scenario as the cause of Uranus’ obliquity as well as on the mechanisms able to give origin to the Uranian irregulars. Methods. Different capture mechanisms for irregulars operate at different stages on the giant planets formation process. The mechanisms able to capture the uranian irregulars before and after the GC are analysed. Assuming that they were captured before the GC, we calculate the orbital transfer of the nine irregulars by the impulse imparted by the GC. If their orbital transfer results dynamically implausible, they should have originated after the GC. We then investigate and discuss the dissipative mechanisms able to operate later. Results. Very few transfers exist for five of the irregulars, which makes their existence before the GC hardly expected. In particular Prospero could not exist at the time of the GC. Different capture mechanisms for Prospero after the GC are investigated. Gas drag by Uranus’envelope and pull-down capture are not plausible mechanisms. Capture of Prospero through a collisionless interaction seems to be difficult. The GC itself provides a mechanism of permanent capture. However, the capture of Prospero by the GC is a low probable event. Catastrophic collisions could be a possible mechanism for the birth of Prospero and the other irregulars after the GC. Orbital and physical clusterings should then be expected. Conclusions. Either Prospero had to originate after the GC or the GC did not occur. In the former case, the mechanism for the origin of Prospero after the GC remains an open question. An observing program able to look for dynamical and physical families is mandatory. In the latter case, another theory to account for Uranus’ obliquity and the formation of the Uranian regular satellites on the equatorial plane of the planet would be needed.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipMGP research was supported by Instituto Argentino de Radioastronom´ıa, IAR-CONICET, Argentina and by Centro de Astrof´ısica, Fondo de Investigaci´on avanzado en Areas Prioritarias, FONDAP number 15010003, Chile. MM acknowledges FONDAP for finantial support during a visit to Universidad de Chile. Part of the work of MM has been supported by INAF FFO-Fondo Ricerca Libera - 2006. AB research was supported by IALP-CONICET.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherEDP Scienceen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectPlanets and satellites: generalen_US
Títulodc.titleConstraints to Uranus’ Great Collision IV. The Origin of Prosperoen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record