Constraints to Uranus’ Great Collision IV. The Origin of Prospero
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2008Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Parisi, M. Gabriela
Cómo citar
Constraints to Uranus’ Great Collision IV. The Origin of Prospero
Abstract
Context. It is widely accepted that the large obliquity of Uranus is the result of a great tangential collision (GC) with an Earth size
proto-planet at the end of the accretion process. The impulse imparted by the GC had affected the Uranian satellite system. Very
recently, nine irregular satellites (irregulars) have been discovered around Uranus. Their orbital and physical properties, in particular
those of the irregular Prospero, set constraints on the GC scenario.
Aims. We attempt to set constraints on the GC scenario as the cause of Uranus’ obliquity as well as on the mechanisms able to give
origin to the Uranian irregulars.
Methods. Different capture mechanisms for irregulars operate at different stages on the giant planets formation process. The mechanisms
able to capture the uranian irregulars before and after the GC are analysed. Assuming that they were captured before the GC,
we calculate the orbital transfer of the nine irregulars by the impulse imparted by the GC. If their orbital transfer results dynamically
implausible, they should have originated after the GC. We then investigate and discuss the dissipative mechanisms able to operate
later.
Results. Very few transfers exist for five of the irregulars, which makes their existence before the GC hardly expected. In particular
Prospero could not exist at the time of the GC. Different capture mechanisms for Prospero after the GC are investigated. Gas drag
by Uranus’envelope and pull-down capture are not plausible mechanisms. Capture of Prospero through a collisionless interaction
seems to be difficult. The GC itself provides a mechanism of permanent capture. However, the capture of Prospero by the GC is a low
probable event. Catastrophic collisions could be a possible mechanism for the birth of Prospero and the other irregulars after the GC.
Orbital and physical clusterings should then be expected.
Conclusions. Either Prospero had to originate after the GC or the GC did not occur. In the former case, the mechanism for the
origin of Prospero after the GC remains an open question. An observing program able to look for dynamical and physical families is
mandatory. In the latter case, another theory to account for Uranus’ obliquity and the formation of the Uranian regular satellites on
the equatorial plane of the planet would be needed.
Patrocinador
MGP research was supported by Instituto Argentino de Radioastronom´ıa, IAR-CONICET, Argentina and by Centro de Astrof´ısica, Fondo de
Investigaci´on avanzado en Areas Prioritarias, FONDAP number 15010003, Chile. MM acknowledges FONDAP for finantial support during a visit to Universidad
de Chile. Part of the work of MM has been supported by INAF FFO-Fondo Ricerca Libera - 2006. AB research was supported by IALP-CONICET.
Quote Item
Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 482, Issue 2, pp.657-664, 2008
Collections