Author | dc.contributor.author | Carrasco, F. | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Rojas, P. | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Ruz, Manuel | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Rebolledo Acevedo, Annabella | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Mizón, Claudio | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Codoceo, Juana | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Inostroza Escobar, Jorge | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Papapietro Vallejo, Karin | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Csendes Juhasz, Attila | es_CL |
Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2008-05-14T14:08:07Z | |
Available date | dc.date.available | 2008-05-14T14:08:07Z | |
Publication date | dc.date.issued | 2007 | es_CL |
Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA Vol. 22 JUL-AUG 2007 4 410-416 | es_CL |
Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/127505 | |
General note | dc.description | Publicación ISI | es_CL |
Abstract | dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare measured resting energy expenditure (REE) with that predicted by formulas derived from populations with normal weight or obesity and from women with severe and morbid obesity. Material and methods: 66 women (aged 35.6 +/- 10.3 y and BMI of 44.7 +/- 4.9 kg/m(2)) were evaluated by indirect calorimetry with a metabolic monitor Deltatrac (Datex Inst., Finland), before undergoing gastric bypass. REE was calculated with the following equations: Harris-Benedict's with both actual and adjusted weight, Ireton-Jones', Mifflin's, and Carrasco's Fast Estimation, which corresponds to 16.2 kcal x kg actual weight. Results: (mean +/- sd). Measured REE was 1797 +/- 239 kcal/day. All formulas, except Harris-Benedict's with adjusted weight, overestimated REE. The Ireton-Jones' equation presented the greater overestimation (689 329 kcal/day), whereas Mifflin's equation overestimated REE only by 6 202 kcal/day. No significant differences were detected between measured and calculated REE by Mifflin's and Carrasco's Fast Estimation. Accuracy (defined as difference between calculated and measured REE within +/- 10%) was greater with Mifflin's equation (68%), followed by Harris-Benedict's with actual weight (64%) and Carrasco's Fast Estimation (61%). By using the Bland-Altman analysis, significant correlations were observed between calculated-measured REE and mean REE (calculated + measured/2) with all equations except Carrasco's Fast Estimation. This means that all but one formula underestimate or overestimate REE depending on the level of measured REE. Conclusion: In severe and morbid obese women, Mifflin's and Carrasco's Fast Estimation equations provided the best performance to estimate REE. Before recommending an equation in an a subset of individuals it is necessary to make previous validation studies mine that equation with the best predictive power for this particular group of patients. | es_CL |
Lenguage | dc.language.iso | es | es_CL |
Keywords | dc.subject | resting energy expenditure | es_CL |
Area Temática | dc.subject.other | Nutrition & Dietetics | es_CL |
Título | dc.title | Concordancia entre gasto energético y reposo medido y estimado por fórmulas predictivas en mujeres con obesidad severa y mórbida | es_CL |
Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | |