Author | dc.contributor.author | Galetovic Potsch, Alexander | |
Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2010-11-30T12:17:34Z | |
Available date | dc.date.available | 2010-11-30T12:17:34Z | |
Publication date | dc.date.issued | 2002-12 | |
Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | Estudios de economía. Vol.29 No. 2 Diciembre 2002 Pags. 177-190 | en_US |
Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/127813 | |
Abstract | dc.description.abstract | This paper studies the determinant of the appropriate rate to fix transmission
tolls. I develop a simple model that allows to decompose it in the sum of the
risk-free rate and a risk premium. There are two general principles with vhich
the rate should conform: (a) it should vary pari passu with the risk-free rate (b)
it should compensate the transmission company for: (i) the “risk of regulatory
opportunism”; (ii) the nondiversifiable risk imposed to the transmission company
by the price-fixing rule; (iii) and also add a liquidity premium. Legislation
presently discussed in congress, however, would grant a fixed 10% real rate to
the transmission company. Approximating the risk-free rate by the rate paid by
a 20-year b ond issued by the Central Bank (PRC) I use the model to estimate
the level of risk that justifies a rate of exactly 10%. Finally, I propose a method
to regulate transmission fees that would eliminate most revenue risk and would
avoid a need to fix a regulated rate. | en_US |
Lenguage | dc.language.iso | es | en_US |
Publisher | dc.publisher | Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Economía y Negocios | en_US |
Keywords | dc.subject | Risk premium | en_US |
Título | dc.title | Nota tecnica 1: Transmisión electrica y la "Ley corta": una nota sobre riesgo y la tasa de descuento | en_US |
Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | |