Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorChisholm, Dan 
Authordc.contributor.authorGureje, Oye es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSaldivia, Sandra es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorVillalón Calderón, Marcelo es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, Rajitha es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorMendis, Nalaka es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorAyuso Mateos, José Luis es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSaxena, Shekhar es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2010-01-13T18:21:10Z
Available datedc.date.available2010-01-13T18:21:10Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2008-07
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Volume: 86 Issue: 7 Pages: 542-551 Published: JUL 2008en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0042-9686
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.2471/BLT.07.045377
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128152
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective Schizophrenia is a highly disabling disease and is costly to treat. We set out to establish what are the most cost-effective interventions applicable to developing regions and countries. Methods Analysis was undertaken at the level of three WHO subregions spanning the Americas, Africa and South-East Asia, and subsequently in three member states (Chile, Nigeria and Sri Lanka). A state transition model was used to estimate the population-level health impact of older and newer antipsychotic drugs, alone or in combination with psychosocial intervention. Total population-level costs (in international dollars or local currencies) and effectiveness (measured in disability-adjusted life years averted) were combined to form cost-effectiveness ratios. Findings The most cost-effective interventions were those using older antipsychotic drugs combined with psychosocial treatment, delivered via a community-based service model (I$ 2350-7158 per disability-adjusted life year averted across the three subregions, I$ 1670-3400 following country-level contextualisation within each of these subregions). The relative cost-effectiveness of interventions making use of newer, "atypical" antipsychotic drugs is estimated to be much less favourable. Conclusion By moving to a community-based service model and selecting efficient treatment options, the cost of substantially increasing treatment coverage is not high (less than I$ 1 investment per capita). Taken together with other priority-setting criteria such as disease severity, vulnerability and human rights protection, this study suggests that a great deal more could be done for persons and families living under the spectre of this disorder.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, MARKETING AND DISSEMINATIONen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALen_US
Títulodc.titleSchizophrenia treatment in the developing world: an interregional and multinational cost-effectiveness analysisen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record