Author | dc.contributor.author | Prado, Arturo | |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Andrades Cvitanic, Patricio | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Benítez Seguel, Susana Alejandra | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Parada, Francisco | es_CL |
Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-13T19:46:24Z | |
Available date | dc.date.available | 2010-01-13T19:46:24Z | |
Publication date | dc.date.issued | 2008-09 | |
Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Volume 32, Number 5, pag. 748-752, 2008 | en_US |
Identifier | dc.identifier.issn | 0364-216X (Print) 1432-5241 (Online) | |
Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128158 | |
Abstract | dc.description.abstract | Background We describe a new method to study the
sensibility of the nipple-areola complex of the breast with
faradic electricity delivered through an electromyographic
device used to monitor peripheral nerve conduction.
Methods The objective results of faradic pulses (2–
50 mA per pulse) delivered to the nipple-areola complex
of the breast through a Nihon-Kohden II machine (Evoked
potential/Electromyographs, Nihon-Kohden Co., Japan)
were evaluated in normal volunteers to get a basal measure
that was defined by the patient as ‘‘a soft electric
discharge.’’ The measures were recorded and their output
discharges averaged (at least 5 to each complex).
Results Twenty-eight volunteers with normal breasts, 28
patients with breast hypertrophy before and after breast
reduction, and 28 patients before and after breast augmentation
were studied. The faradic pulses were perceived
from 1.5 to 3.5 mA in the areola and from 3 to 5.5 mA in
the nipple in the control group and from 4.5 to 7.0 mA in
the areola and from 6.5 to 9.5 mA in the nipple in the
breast hypertrophy group with no significant changes
before and after surgery. In the breast augmentation group
the faradic pulses were very similar to the volunteers that
had normal breasts, but 13 months after breast augmentation
with silicone gel prosthesis, a difference was found
because all the patients had a higher threshold and three
cases had lost sensibility of the nipple-areola complex.
Conclusion In normal breasts the areola had a lower
threshold for faradic pulses compared to the nipple.
Hypertrophic breasts had a higher threshold to the faradic
stimulation than normal subjects in the pre- and postoperative
period. Hypoplastic breasts before breast
augmentation had a perception threshold similar to that of
the normal volunteers but after breast augmentation this
perception was much higher. | en_US |
Lenguage | dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
Publisher | dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
Keywords | dc.subject | Breast sensibility | en_US |
Título | dc.title | Areola-Nipple Perception Threshold to Faradic Electricity: A New Measure of Sensibility of the Breasts | en_US |
Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | |