Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPrado, Arturo 
Authordc.contributor.authorAndrades Cvitanic, Patricio es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorBenítez Seguel, Susana Alejandra es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorParada, Francisco es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2010-01-13T19:46:24Z
Available datedc.date.available2010-01-13T19:46:24Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2008-09
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationAesthetic Plastic Surgery, Volume 32, Number 5, pag. 748-752, 2008en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0364-216X (Print) 1432-5241 (Online)
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128158
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground We describe a new method to study the sensibility of the nipple-areola complex of the breast with faradic electricity delivered through an electromyographic device used to monitor peripheral nerve conduction. Methods The objective results of faradic pulses (2– 50 mA per pulse) delivered to the nipple-areola complex of the breast through a Nihon-Kohden II machine (Evoked potential/Electromyographs, Nihon-Kohden Co., Japan) were evaluated in normal volunteers to get a basal measure that was defined by the patient as ‘‘a soft electric discharge.’’ The measures were recorded and their output discharges averaged (at least 5 to each complex). Results Twenty-eight volunteers with normal breasts, 28 patients with breast hypertrophy before and after breast reduction, and 28 patients before and after breast augmentation were studied. The faradic pulses were perceived from 1.5 to 3.5 mA in the areola and from 3 to 5.5 mA in the nipple in the control group and from 4.5 to 7.0 mA in the areola and from 6.5 to 9.5 mA in the nipple in the breast hypertrophy group with no significant changes before and after surgery. In the breast augmentation group the faradic pulses were very similar to the volunteers that had normal breasts, but 13 months after breast augmentation with silicone gel prosthesis, a difference was found because all the patients had a higher threshold and three cases had lost sensibility of the nipple-areola complex. Conclusion In normal breasts the areola had a lower threshold for faradic pulses compared to the nipple. Hypertrophic breasts had a higher threshold to the faradic stimulation than normal subjects in the pre- and postoperative period. Hypoplastic breasts before breast augmentation had a perception threshold similar to that of the normal volunteers but after breast augmentation this perception was much higher.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeren_US
Keywordsdc.subjectBreast sensibilityen_US
Títulodc.titleAreola-Nipple Perception Threshold to Faradic Electricity: A New Measure of Sensibility of the Breastsen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record