Author | dc.contributor.author | Riquelme, Arnoldo | |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Méndez, Benjamín | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Fuente, Paloma de la | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Padilla, Oslando | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Benaglio, Carla | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Sirhan, Marisol | es_CL |
Author | dc.contributor.author | Labarca, Jaime | es_CL |
Admission date | dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-04T14:58:22Z | |
Available date | dc.date.available | 2012-01-04T14:58:22Z | |
Publication date | dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
Cita de ítem | dc.identifier.citation | Rev Med Chile 2011; 139: 45-53 | es_CL |
Identifier | dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128938 | |
General note | dc.description | Artículo de publicación ISI | es_CL |
Abstract | dc.description.abstract | Background: Portfolio is an innovative instrument that promotes refl ection,
creativity and professionalism among students. Aim: To describe the development
and validation process of a questionnaire to evaluate the use of portfolio in undergraduate
medical students. Material and Methods: Focus groups with students and
teachers were employed to identify aspects related with portfolio in undergraduate
teaching. The Delphi technique was used to prioritize relevant aspects and construct
the questionnaire. The validated questionnaire, consisting in 43 items and 6 factors,
was applied to 97 students (response rate of 99.9%) in 2007 and 100 students (99.2%)
in 2008. Each question had to be answered using a Likert scale, from 0 (completely
disagree) to 4 (completely agree) The validity and reliability of the questionnaire
was evaluated. Results: The questionnaire showed a high reliability (Cronbach
alpha = 0.9). The mean total scores obtained in 2007 and 2008 were 106.2 ± 21.2
(61.7% of the maximal obtainable score) and 104.6 ± 34.0 (60.8% of the maximal
obtainable score), respectively. No signifi cant differences were seen in the analysis by
factors. Changes in portfolio during 2008 showed differences in items related with
organization, evaluation and regulation. Conclusions: The questionnaire is a valid
and highly reliable instrument, measuring perceptions about the portfolio by undergraduate
medical students. The students perceived an improvement in their creativity
and professionalism as one of the strengths of portfolio. The weaknesses identifi ed
during the implementation process helped us to focus changes in organization and
evaluation to improve the portfolio as a dynamic process. | es_CL |
Lenguage | dc.language.iso | es | es_CL |
Keywords | dc.subject | Portfolios | es_CL |
Título | dc.title | Desarrollo y validación de encuesta de percepción del portafolio en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado | es_CL |
Title in another language | dc.title.alternative | Development and validation of a questionnaire on perception of portfolio by undergraduate medical students | es_CL |
Document type | dc.type | Artículo de revista | |