Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorRiquelme, Arnoldo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMéndez, Benjamín es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorFuente, Paloma de la es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorPadilla, Oslando es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorBenaglio, Carla es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorSirhan, Marisol es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorLabarca, Jaime es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2012-01-04T14:58:22Z
Available datedc.date.available2012-01-04T14:58:22Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2011
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRev Med Chile 2011; 139: 45-53es_CL
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/128938
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIes_CL
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: Portfolio is an innovative instrument that promotes refl ection, creativity and professionalism among students. Aim: To describe the development and validation process of a questionnaire to evaluate the use of portfolio in undergraduate medical students. Material and Methods: Focus groups with students and teachers were employed to identify aspects related with portfolio in undergraduate teaching. The Delphi technique was used to prioritize relevant aspects and construct the questionnaire. The validated questionnaire, consisting in 43 items and 6 factors, was applied to 97 students (response rate of 99.9%) in 2007 and 100 students (99.2%) in 2008. Each question had to be answered using a Likert scale, from 0 (completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree) The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated. Results: The questionnaire showed a high reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.9). The mean total scores obtained in 2007 and 2008 were 106.2 ± 21.2 (61.7% of the maximal obtainable score) and 104.6 ± 34.0 (60.8% of the maximal obtainable score), respectively. No signifi cant differences were seen in the analysis by factors. Changes in portfolio during 2008 showed differences in items related with organization, evaluation and regulation. Conclusions: The questionnaire is a valid and highly reliable instrument, measuring perceptions about the portfolio by undergraduate medical students. The students perceived an improvement in their creativity and professionalism as one of the strengths of portfolio. The weaknesses identifi ed during the implementation process helped us to focus changes in organization and evaluation to improve the portfolio as a dynamic process.es_CL
Lenguagedc.language.isoeses_CL
Keywordsdc.subjectPortfolioses_CL
Títulodc.titleDesarrollo y validación de encuesta de percepción del portafolio en estudiantes de medicina de pregradoes_CL
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeDevelopment and validation of a questionnaire on perception of portfolio by undergraduate medical studentses_CL
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record