Tuberculosis in Antiretroviral Treatment Programs in Lower Income Countries: Availability and Use of Diagnostics and Screening
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cortés Moncada, Claudia
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-13T15:33:24Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-13T15:33:24Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
PLoS ONE 8(10): e77697
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077697
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129140
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: In resource-constrained settings, tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection and cause of death in
HIV-infected persons. TB may be present at the start of antiretroviral therapy (ART), but it is often under-diagnosed. We
describe approaches to TB diagnosis and screening of TB in ART programs in low- and middle-income countries.
Methods and findings: We surveyed ART programs treating HIV-infected adults in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin
America in 2012 using online questionnaires to collect program-level and patient-level data. Forty-seven sites from 26
countries participated. Patient-level data were collected on 987 adult TB patients from 40 sites (median age 34.7 years; 54%
female). Sputum smear microscopy and chest radiograph were available in 47 (100%) sites, TB culture in 44 (94%), and Xpert
MTB/RIF in 23 (49%). Xpert MTB/RIF was rarely available in Central Africa and South America. In sites with access to these
diagnostics, microscopy was used in 745 (76%) patients diagnosed with TB, culture in 220 (24%), and chest X-ray in 688
(70%) patients. When free of charge culture was done in 27% of patients, compared to 21% when there was a fee
(p = 0.033). Corresponding percentages for Xpert MTB/RIF were 26% and 15% of patients (p = 0.001). Screening practices for
active disease before starting ART included symptom screening (46 sites, 98%), chest X-ray (38, 81%), sputum microscopy
(37, 79%), culture (16, 34%), and Xpert MTB/RIF (5, 11%).
Conclusions: Mycobacterial culture was infrequently used despite its availability at most sites, while Xpert MTB/RIF was not
generally available. Use of available diagnostics was higher when offered free of charge.