Effects of dobutamine on systemic, regional and microcirculatory perfusion parameters in septic shock: a randomized, placebocontrolled, double-blind, crossover study

Abstract

Purpose: The role of dobutamine during septic shock resuscitation is still controversial since most clinical studies have been uncontrolled and no physiological study has unequivocally demonstrated a beneficial effect on tissue perfusion. Our objective was to determine the potential benefits of dobutamine on hemodynamic, metabolic, peripheral, hepatosplanchnic and microcirculatory perfusion parameters during early septic shock resuscitation. Methods: We designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover study comparing the effects of 2.5-h infusion of dobutamine (5 mcg/kg/min fixeddose) or placebo in 20 septic shock patients with cardiac index C2.5 l/ min/m2 and hyperlactatemia. Primary outcome was sublingual perfused microvascular density. Results: Despite an increasing cardiac index, heart rate and left ventricular ejection fraction, dobutamine had no effect on sublingual perfused vessel density [9.0 (7.9–10.1) vs. 9.1 n/mm (7.9–9.9); p = 0.24] or microvascular flow index [2.1 (1.8–2.5) vs. 2.1 (1.9–2.5); p = 0.73] compared to placebo. No differences between dobutamine and placebo were found for the lactate levels, mixed venousarterial pCO2 gradient, thenar muscle oxygen saturation, capillary refill time or gastric-to-arterial pCO2 gradient. The indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate [14.4 (9.5–25.6) vs. 18.8 %/min (11.7–24.6); p = 0.03] and the recovery slope of thenar muscle oxygen saturation after a vascular occlusion test [2.1 (1.1–3.1) vs. 2.5 %/s (1.2–3.4); p = 0.01] were worse with dobutamine compared to placebo. Conclusions: Dobutamine failed to improve sublingual microcirculatory, metabolic, hepatosplanchnic or peripheral perfusion parameters despite inducing a significant increase in systemic hemodynamic variables in septic shock patients without low cardiac output but with persistent hypoperfusion.