Effects of LED–laser hybrid light on bleaching effectiveness and tooth sensitivity: a randomized clinical study
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bortolatto, Janaina F.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pretel, Hermes
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Neto, Carolina S.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Andrade, Marcelo F.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mondaca Cortés, Gustavo Adolfo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Oliveira, Osmir Batista
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-24T15:01:08Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-24T15:01:08Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013-06
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Laser Phys. Lett. 10 (2013) 085601 (6pp) DOI:10.1088/1612-2011/10/8/085601
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129165
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The study evaluated the effectiveness and the sensitivity of in-office tooth bleaching with the use of
a hybrid photo-activation system composed by LEDs and lasers. 40 patients, both genders, aged 18
through 25 years, were randomly distributed into two treatment groups: group I, 35% hydrogen
peroxide, with a total bleaching time of 135 min divided into three sessions, and group II, 35%
hydrogen peroxide and photo-thermal catalysis by an LED–laser system (300 mW cm2), for a
total bleaching time of 72 min divided into three sessions. The treatment efficiency was measured
by reflectance spectroscopy and sensitivity by a visual analog scale (VAS). The final luminosity
value (1L), color variation (1E) and sensitivity (S) resulting from the treatments were analyzed by
the generalized estimating equations method (GEEs), and Bonferroni post hoc multiple
comparisons at 5% significance. The two groups presented similar colors (1E) and luminosities
(1L) after treatment. Group I presented a greater sensitivity index (37:6 5:9%) compared to
group II (11:1 3:3%), statistically significant at p < 0:05. The use of LED–laser hybrid light, as
a catalyst of the bleaching agents, showed a significant decrease of provoked tooth sensitivity and a
treatment time reduced by 53%, with the same aesthetic results as without a light source.