Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAlburquenque, Claudio 
Authordc.contributor.authorBeltrán, Sebastian es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorOlivares Castillo, Roberto es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorFalconer, Mary A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorAmaro, José es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorFuentes, Marisol es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorTapia Paredes, Cecilia es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T15:40:57Z
Available datedc.date.available2014-01-29T15:40:57Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2013
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRev Chilena Infectol 2013; 30 (3): 244-251en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn07161018
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.4067/S0716-10182013000300002
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129208
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The most of the surveillance studies has been conducted in hospitalized patients with invasive infections. Recently, new clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have been proposed for antifungal susceptibility testing and epidemiological cutoffs (ECVs). Aim: To evaluate species distribution and susceptibility pattern of Candida spp. obtained from in and outpatients in a period of 6 months. Material and Methods: The isolates (n=223) came from vaginal discharge (51.6%), lower respiratory tract (24.7%), urine (20.2%), wounds (1.8%), blood (0.9%), peritoneal fluid (0.4%) and nails (0.4%). Results: The species distribution was C. albicans 84.8% (n: 189), C. glabrata 7.6% (n: 17), C. tropicalis 2.7% (n: 6), C. parapsilosis 2.2% (n: 5), C. kefyr 0.9% (n: 2) and others 1.8% (C. krusei, C. lusitanie, C. guilliermondii, C. intermedia) (n: 4). The susceptibility dose dependence (SDD) and resistance were 3.2% for fluconazole and 2.2% for voriconazole. The most of SDD and resistant strains were isolated from ambulatory patients. Also, a higher percentage of MICs over the new CBPs and ECVs were found in strains from ambulatory patients and especially in C. glabrata isolates to caspofungin. Conclusion: Taking into consideration that most of the invasive infections are caused by strains from the endogenous microbiota, and that there is a resistant population of Candida spp. in the community, should be important to include in surveillance studies strains isolated from ambulatory patients.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoesen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Chilena de Infectología
Keywordsdc.subjectCandidaen_US
Títulodc.titleDistribución de especies y perfil de susceptibilidad de aislados de Candida spp: la importancia de vigilar también cepas de la comunidaden_US
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeSpecies distribution and susceptibility pattern of Candida spp.: the importance to survey also strains isolated from the communityen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile