Occupational secondhand smoke is the main determinant of hair nicotine concentrations in bar and restaurant workers
Author
dc.contributor.author
Iglesias Álamos, Verónica
Author
dc.contributor.author
Erazo Bahamondes, Marcia
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Droppelmann, Andrea
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Steenland, Kyle
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Aceituno, Paulina
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Orellana Pozo, Cecilia
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Acuña, Marisol
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Peruga, Armando
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Breysse, Patrick N.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Navas Acien, Ana
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-15T15:04:41Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-15T15:04:41Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Environmental Research 132 (2014) 206–211
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.044
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129374
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objective
To evaluate the relative contribution of occupational vs. non-occupational secondhand tobacco smoke exposure to overall hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking bar and restaurant employees.
Method
We recruited 76 non-smoking employees from venues that allowed smoking (n=9), had mixed policies (smoking and non-smoking areas, n=13) or were smoke-free (n=2) between April and August 2008 in Santiago, Chile. Employees used personal air nicotine samplers during working and non-working hours for a 24-h period to assess occupational vs. non-occupational secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and hair nicotine concentrations to assess overall secondhand tobacco smoke exposure.
Results
Median hair nicotine concentrations were 1.5 ng/mg, interquartile range (IQR) 0.7 to 5.2 ng/mg. Time weighted average personal air nicotine concentrations were higher during working hours (median 9.7, IQR 3.3–25.4 µg/m3) compared to non-working hours (1.7, 1.0–3.1 µg/m3). Hair nicotine concentration was best predicted by personal air nicotine concentration at working hours. After adjustment, a 2-fold increase in personal air nicotine concentration in working hours was associated with a 42% increase in hair nicotine concentration (95% confidence interval 14–70%). Hair nicotine concentration was not associated with personal air nicotine concentration during non-working hours (non-occupational exposure).
Conclusions
Personal air nicotine concentration at working hours was the major determinant of hair nicotine concentrations in non-smoking employees from Santiago, Chile. Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure during working hours is a health hazard for hospitality employees working in venues where smoking is allowed.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
This study was funded by International Training and Research in Environmental and Occupational Health (ITREOH), Fogarty International Center, NIH Research Grant #D43TW005746-02 and by a Clinical Investigator Award from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute.