Strong responsiveness to noise interference in an anuran from the southern temperate forest
Author
dc.contributor.author
Penna Varela, Mario
Author
dc.contributor.author
Zúñiga, Daniel
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-30T13:31:01Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-30T13:31:01Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2014) 68:85–97
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI 10.1007/s00265-013-1625-3
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129510
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Animals adopt different strategies to communicate
by means of sound in noisy environments. Some animals
increase, while others decrease, their vocal activity in the
presence of interference. Anuran amphibians from diverse
latitudes exhibit both kinds of responses. Recent studies have
shown that males of Batrachyla taeniata and Batrachyla
antartandica from the temperate austral forest do not call in
response to the presentation of advertisement calls of sympatric
congeneric species, but their responsiveness to other kinds of
interference has not been tested. To explore the diversity in
responsiveness to acoustic intrusion in a single species, we
exposed males of B. taeniata to prolonged prerecorded natural
abiotic noises of wind, creek, and rain and to a band-pass noise
centered at 2,000 Hz, at 67 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The
subjects drastically increased their call rate when exposed to all
four sounds. Frogs also responded by augmenting their vocal
activity to exposures of band-pass noise at increasing intensities
(55–79 dB SPL). The increase in vocal activity in response
to noise is strong relative to those of other anurans from the
temperate forest studied previously under similar exposures.
These results reveal a remarkable activation of vocal response
to acoustic interference of continuous abiotic noise, which
would allow compensating for limitations in the active communication
space under background sounds. This strategy
contrasts with the decrease in vocal output amid interference
from heterospecific signals reported formerly for this frog, a
tactic that would restrict energy expenditure to relevant acoustic
competition with conspecifics.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
This study was supported by
FONDECYT grant 1080459.