Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSani, Gabriele 
Authordc.contributor.authorVöhringer, Paul A. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorNapoletano, Flavia es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorHoltzman, Niki S. es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorDalley, Shannon es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorGirardi, Paolo es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorGhaemi, S. Nassir es_CL
Authordc.contributor.authorKoukopoulos, Athanasios es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-01-09T17:15:57Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-01-09T17:15:57Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2014
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders Volume 164, 1 August 2014, Pages 14–18en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.054
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/129627
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground Mixed depression (MxD) is one subtype of depressive experiences within the depressive spectrum. MxD definition is debated among experts. Koukopoulos׳ proposed diagnostic criteria focused primarily on psychic agitation, marked irritability, and intense mood lability as markers of a mixed depressive episode. The present study validates Koukopoulos׳ criteria as diagnostic for MxD. Methods A sample of 435 patients from the International Mood Network (IMN), multi-center, international network of sites, and the Centro LucioBini of Rome was analyzed. Koukopoulos׳ criteria were assessed in all patients. Results The most prevalent MxD criteria were “absence of psychomotor retardation” (84%), “mood lability or marked reactivity” (78%), and “psychic agitation or inner tension” (75%). Multivariable predictors of a MxD (+) diagnosis were: higher current CGI (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.23, 2.84), lower rates of previous bipolar type I diagnosis (OR=0.54, 95% CI −3.28, −0.13), mixed symptoms on the index episode (OR=10.02, 95% CI 2.32, 24.12), rapid cycling course (OR=2.6 95% CI 1.45, 3.56), past substance abuse (OR=3.02, 95% CI 2.01, 5.67) and lower education status (OR=0.44, 95% CI −3.23, −0.98). This model showed a sensitivity of 76.4%, specificity of 86.3%, negative predictive value of 75%, and positive predictive value of 86%. Limitations An external validation of these criteria in an independent sample is warranted. Conclusion A broad definition of mixed depression was internally validated with multiple diagnostic validators and was sensitively and specifically predicted. Contrary to DSM-5, Koukopoulos׳ broad criteria include agitation, irritability and mood lability as core features.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectDiagnostic criteriaen_US
Títulodc.titleKoukopoulos׳ diagnostic criteria for mixed depression: A validation studyen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile