Peru v. Chile : The International Court of Justice decides on the status of the maritime boundary
Author
dc.contributor.author
Infante Caffi, María Teresa
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-10-21T19:40:06Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-10-21T19:40:06Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Chinese Journal of International Law. (2014), p. 741-762
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
1746-9937
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134576
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The ICJ’s decision addresses facts and themes related to the question whether
or not a maritime boundary extended to 200-nautical miles had been set
between Chile and Peru. Thus, the ICJ decision is deeply interwoven with
the history of the maritime zone of 200–nautical miles and its Latin American
roots.The task of theCourtwas to ascertain whether a delimited boundary had
been agreed, and if that had been the case, whether it has been established in
connection with the long standing proclamations of an extended maritime
zone of 200 nautical miles, first unilaterally and then multilaterally by the
1952 Santiago Declaration on the Maritime Zone and further agreements.
The explicit reference to a delimitation line embedded in successive agreements
was settled in favor of an implicit agreement enshrined in the terms of the 1954
Agreement of a Maritime Frontier Zone, preceded by a subtle crystallization of
a delimitation process prior to it. The point was deduced from Article I of the
1954 Agreement which explicitly states that “A special zone is hereby established,
at a distance of 12 nautical miles from the coast, extending to a
breadth of 10 nautical miles on either side of the parallel which constitutes
the maritime boundary between the two countries”.