Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMartín Casielles, Javier 
Authordc.contributor.authorVildósola Grez, Patricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorBersezio Miranda, Cristian 
Authordc.contributor.authorHerrera Ronda, Andrea 
Authordc.contributor.authorBortolatto, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSaad, J. R. C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorOliveira, Osmir Batista 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Godoy, Eduardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-11-02T18:09:06Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-11-02T18:09:06Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry Volumen: 43 Número: 8 Páginas: 965-972en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.011
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134800
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this clinical randomized double-blind split-mouth study was to assess the effectiveness of a 6% hydrogen peroxide with nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide light activated bleaching agent. Method: 31 patients were treated with: one upper hemiarcade with a 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent and the other hemiarcade with a 6% hydrogen peroxide. Two applications were completed each treatment session and three sessions were appointed, with one week interval between them. Tooth colour was registered each session and 1 week and 1 months after completing the treatment by spectrophotometer, registering parameters L*, a* and b*, and subjectively using VITA Classic guide. Tooth sensitivity was registered by VAS and patient satisfaction and self-perception result was determined using OHIP-14. Tooth colour variation and sensitivity were compared between both bleaching agents. Results: Both treatment showed a change between baseline colour and all check-points with a Delta E = 5.57 for 6% and of Delta E = 7.98 for the 35% one month after completing the (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were seen when subjective evaluations were compared. Also, no differences were seen in tooth sensitivity between bleaching agents. OHIP-14 questionnaire demonstrated a significant change for all patients after bleaching. Conclusions: A 6% hydrogen peroxide with nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide light activated agent is effective for tooth bleaching, reaching a Delta E of 5.57 one month after completing the treatment, with no clinical differences to a 35% agent neither in colour change or in tooth sensitivity. Clinical significance: A low concentration hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent may reach good clinical results with less adverse effects.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectBleaching teethen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectLow concentrationen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectOHIP-14en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectEffectivenessen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectTitanium dioxideen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectClinical randomized trialen_US
Títulodc.titleEffectiveness of 6% hydrogen peroxide concentration for tooth bleaching-A double-blind, randomized clinical trialen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile