Psychoanalysis in Postmodern Times: Some Questions and Challenges
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez de la Jara, Juan Pablo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-11-05T18:46:16Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-11-05T18:46:16Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 35:609–624, 2015
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2015.1055221
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134867
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
As a consequence of the invitation to contribute this piece of writing, I acknowledge having a
postmodern attitude, rather than subscribing to postmodernism as an ideology. The purpose behind
this article is to reflect on the impact of postmodern times on psychoanalysis from the starting point
of my own conception of psychoanalytic theory and practice. This article looks, in some detail, into
the problem of truth in psychoanalysis, the issue of theory building in psychoanalysis in its relation
to psychoanalytic practice, and the challenges for psychoanalysis as a pluralistic discipline. It
repeatedly states that psychoanalysis evidences extreme theoretical and practical diversity, but no
pluralism understood as an attitude and methodology of dialogue between theoretical orientations
and practical approaches. The current challenge in psychoanalysis is, precisely, to go beyond
postmodernism and to build a true pluralism on the basis on interdisciplinary exchange and
collaboration.