No differences in morphological characteristics between hyperplastic condyle and class III condyle
Author
dc.contributor.author
Goulart, D. R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz, P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Olate, S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moraes, M. de
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fariña Sirandoni, Rodrigo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-12-13T18:57:04Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-12-13T18:57:04Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015; 44: 1281–1286
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.05.018
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/135663
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The aim of this research was to compare the condylar morphology of patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) and patients with a class III skeletal relationship using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A prospective study was conducted on patients with facial asymmetry attending the division of oral and maxillofacial surgery of the study university in Chile. Fifteen patients with UCH and 15 with a class III skeletal relationship were selected. Linear measurements of the condylar processes were obtained at a scale of 1:1 using the software Ez3D Viewer Plus. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the paired t-test were used, considering P < 0.05. Patients with UCH presented statistical differences between the hyperplastic condyle and non-hyperplastic condyle for anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters, condylar neck length, and ramus height. Patients with a class III skeletal relationship showed no differences between the right and left sides; the morphology of their condyles was similar to the condyles with hyperplasia and presented statistical differences when compared with the non-hyperplastic condyles (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05). The condylar morphology of UCH patients could be related to the development of a class III skeletal relationship. These findings provide an insight into the possibility of some class III patients presenting bilateral condylar hyperplasia.