Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorJohnston, Bradley C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorEbrahim, Shanil 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco Labra, Alonso 
Authordc.contributor.authorFurukawa, Toshi A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPatrick, Donald L. 
Authordc.contributor.authorCrawford, Mark W. 
Authordc.contributor.authorHemmelgarn, Brenda R. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSchunemann, Holger J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGuyatt, Gordon H. 
Authordc.contributor.authorNesrallah, Gihad 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-01-05T14:51:02Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-01-05T14:51:02Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2015; 5: e007953en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/136165
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractIntroduction Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often the outcomes of greatest importance to patients. The minimally important difference (MID) provides a measure of the smallest change in the PRO that patients perceive as important. An anchor-based approach is the most appropriate method for MID determination. No study or database currently exists that provides all anchor-based MIDs associated with PRO instruments; nor are there any accepted standards for appraising the credibility of MID estimates. Our objectives are to complete a systematic survey of the literature to collect and characterise published anchor-based MIDs associated with PRO instruments used in evaluating the effects of interventions on chronic medical and psychiatric conditions and to assess their credibility. Methods and analysis We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO (1989 to present) to identify studies addressing methods to estimate anchor-based MIDs of target PRO instruments or reporting empirical ascertainment of anchor-based MIDs. Teams of two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, review full texts of citations, and extract relevant data. On the basis of findings from studies addressing methods to estimate anchor-based MIDs, we will summarise the available methods and develop an instrument addressing the credibility of empirically ascertained MIDs. We will evaluate the credibility of all studies reporting on the empirical ascertainment of anchor-based MIDs using the credibility instrument, and assess the instrument's inter-rater reliability. We will separately present reports for adult and paediatric populations. Ethics and dissemination No research ethics approval was required as we will be using aggregate data from published studies. Our work will summarise anchor-based methods available to establish MIDs, provide an instrument to assess the credibility of available MIDs, determine the reliability of that instrument, and provide a comprehensive compendium of published anchor-based MIDs associated with PRO instruments which will help improve the interpretability of outcome effects in systematic reviews and practice guidelines.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research DC0190SRen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectMIDen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMinimally Important Differenceen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectPatient Reported Outcomeen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSystematic Surveyen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectProtocolen_US
Títulodc.titleMinimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocolen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile