Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorTroncoso Palacios, Jaime 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-03-24T02:15:19Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-03-24T02:15:19Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Herpetologica 10(2): 125-127, 2015en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/137379
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractI discuss the arguments put forth recently by Pincheira-Donoso, in which the author attempts to revalidate Liolaemus filiorum Pincheira-Donoso & Ramirez, 2005, a species which I had previously considered a junior synonym of L. puritamensis. The author of this revalidation omitted important information including: 1) the description was published without peer review, 2) one of the two types was deposited in a personal collection, 3) the diagnosis is weak and unclear, 4) the holotype was not explicitly described or illustrated. Additionally, the author did not discuss key aspects of my paper, most particularly, the incorrect designation of the holotype of L. filiorum.en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherFirenze Univ. Pressen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectHolotypeen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSpecies descriptionen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSynonymyen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectLiolaemusen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectICZNen_US
Títulodc.titleOn the taxonomic status of Liolaemus filiorum Pincheira-Donoso & Ramirez, 2005 (Iguania: Liolaemidae): A response to Pincheira-Donosoen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile