Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bennett, Derrick A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brayne, Carol
Author
dc.contributor.author
Feigin, Valery L.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barker Collo, Suzanne
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brainin, Michael
Author
dc.contributor.author
Davis, Daniel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gallo, Valentina
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jette, Nathalie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Karch, Andre
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kurtzke, John F.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lavados Germain, Pablo Manuel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Logroscino, Giancarlo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Nagel, Gabriele
Author
dc.contributor.author
Preux, Pierre-Marie
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rothwell, Peter M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Svenson, Lawrence W.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-05-10T13:28:35Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-05-10T13:28:35Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Neurology® 2015;85:821–828
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/138238
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: Incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders play an important role in assessing the burden of disease and planning services. However, the assessment of disease estimates is hindered by problems in reporting for such studies. Despite a growth in published reports, existing guidelines relate to analytical rather than descriptive epidemiologic studies. There are also no user-friendly tools (e.g., checklists) available for authors, editors, and peer reviewers to facilitate best practice in reporting of descriptive epidemiologic studies for most neurologic disorders.
Objective: The Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) is a guideline that consists of recommendations and a checklist to facilitate better reporting of published incidence and prevalence studies of neurologic disorders.
Methods: A review of previously developed guidance was used to produce a list of items required for incidence and prevalence studies in neurology. A 3-round Delphi technique was used to identify the "basic minimum items" important for reporting, as well as some additional "ideal reporting items." An e-consultation process was then used in order to gauge opinion by external neuro-epidemiologic experts on the appropriateness of the items included in the checklist.
Findings: Of 38 candidate items, 15 items and accompanying recommendations were developed along with a user-friendly checklist.
Conclusions: The introduction and use of the STROND checklist should lead to more consistent, transparent, and contextualized reporting of descriptive neuroepidemiologic studies resulting in more applicable and comparable findings and ultimately support better health care decisions.
Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology