Introducing the Body-QoL((R)): A New Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Measuring Body Satisfaction-Related Quality of Life in Aesthetic and Post-bariatric Body Contouring Patients
Artículo
Open/ Download
Publication date
2016Metadata
Show full item record
Cómo citar
Danilla Enei, Stefan
Cómo citar
Introducing the Body-QoL((R)): A New Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Measuring Body Satisfaction-Related Quality of Life in Aesthetic and Post-bariatric Body Contouring Patients
Author
- Danilla Enei, Stefan;
- Cuevas Troncoso, Pedro;
- Aedo Monsalve, Sócrates;
- Prieto Dominguez, Juan Carlos;
- Jara, Rocío;
- Calderón, María;
- Al Himdani, Sarah;
- Rios, Marco;
- Taladriz, Cristián;
- Rodriguez, Diego;
- González, Rolando;
- Lazo, Ángel;
- Erazo Cortes, Cristian;
- Benítez Seguel, Susana Alejandra;
- Andrades Cvitanic, Patricio;
- Sepúlveda Pereira, Sergio;
Abstract
To develop a new patient-reported outcome instrument (PRO) to measure body-related satisfaction quality of life (QoL).
Standard 3-phase PRO design was followed; in the first phase, a qualitative design was used in 45 patients to develop a conceptual framework and to create preliminary scale domains and items. In phase 2, large-scale population testing on 1340 subjects was performed to reduce items and domains. In phase 3, final testing of the developed instrument on 34 patients was performed. Statistics used include Factor, RASCH, and multivariate regression analysis. Psychometric properties measured were internal reliability, item-rest, item-test, and test-retest correlations.
The PRO-developed instrument is composed of four domains (satisfaction with the abdomen, sex life, self-esteem and social life, and physical symptoms) and 20 items in total. The score can range from 20 (worst) to 100 (best). Responsiveness was 100 %, internal reliability 93.3 %, and test-retest concordance 97.7 %. Body image-related QoL was superior in men than women (p < 0.001) and decreased with increasing age (p = 0.004) and BMI (p < 0.001). Post-bariatric body contouring patients score lower than cosmetic patients in all domains of the Body-QoL instrument (p < 0.001). After surgery, the score improves by on average 21.9 +/- A 16.9 (effect size 1.8, p < 0.001).
Body satisfaction-related QoL can be measured reliably with the Body-QoL instrument. It can be used to quantify the improvement in cosmetic and post-bariatric patients including non- or minimally invasive procedures, suction assisted lipectomy, abdominoplasty, lipoabdominoplasty, and lower body lift and to give an evidence-based approach to standard practice.
General note
Artículo de publicación ISI
Quote Item
Aesth Plast Surg (2016) 40:19–29
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: