Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Verónica 
Authordc.contributor.authorCarrasco Naranjo, Fernando 
Authordc.contributor.authorCuevas, Ada 
Authordc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Barbara 
Authordc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Giselle 
Authordc.contributor.authorGhiardo, Daniela 
Authordc.contributor.authorBurr, Maria 
Authordc.contributor.authorLehmann, Yael 
Authordc.contributor.authorLeiva, Maria 
Authordc.contributor.authorBerry, Marcos 
Authordc.contributor.authorMaluenda, Fernando 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-06-16T22:52:11Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-06-16T22:52:11Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationNutrition 32 (2016) 303–308en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.08.023
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/138933
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectives: Weight regain after bariatric surgery may be associated with behavioral, metabolic, or mechanical factors alone or in combination. The aim of this study was to investigate which factors are related to weight regain in the long-term after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Methods: A retrospective case-control study with 40 patients undergoing SG (32 women, 8 men; age 42.9 +/- 10.7 y; preoperative body mass index 35 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)), was performed. Patients were grouped according percentile->50% (cases) or <50% (controls)-of weight regain (%WR cutoff: 25% of weight loss). Weight history, anthropometry, glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), thyroid-stimulating hormone, resting energy expenditure, body composition, dietary survey, psychological test, and physical activity were recorded. Residual gastric capacity was estimated using a radiologic method. Results (median [p25-p75]): The evaluation was conducted 38.5 mo (34-41 mo) after SG. Percent weight regain ranged from 2.7% to 129.2% (25.4% [13-37.1]). Patients in the higher %WR group had a greater residual gastric volume (252.7 +/- 108.4 versus 148.5 +/- 25.3; P < 0.05) and the estimated volume was significantly correlated with %WR (r = 0.673; P = 0.023). Significantly higher body mass index (P = 0.001), resting energy expenditure (P = 0.04), fasting insulin (P = 0.01), and HOMA-IR (P = 0.02) were observed in the higher %WR group. A higher fat intake and a trend toward higher total energy intake were observed in the group with greater %WR. Clinical or borderline levels of anxiety were more frequently observed in the higher %WR group (70% versus 30%; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Results from the present study demonstrated that the most important factor associated with long-term weight regain after SG was residual gastric volume. Additional prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are necessary to confirm our results.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipgrant DI, Academic Department, Clinica Las Condes; Covidienen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectCirugía bariátricaen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSleeve gastrectomyen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectWeight regainen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectGastric volumeen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectFood intakeen_US
Títulodc.titleMechanisms of long-term weight regain in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomyen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile