Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorNicolaides, Kypros H. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSyngelaki, Argyro 
Authordc.contributor.authorPoon, Liona C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPicciarelli, Gemma 
Authordc.contributor.authorTul, Natasa 
Authordc.contributor.authorZamprakou, Aikaterini 
Authordc.contributor.authorSkyfta, Evdoxia 
Authordc.contributor.authorParra Cordero, Mauro 
Authordc.contributor.authorPalma Días, Ricardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-06-28T20:29:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-06-28T20:29:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine Volumen: 374 Número: 11 Páginas: 1044-1052 (2016)en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511014
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/139169
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal and infant death and of disability among survivors. It is unclear whether a pessary inserted around the cervix reduces the risk of preterm singleton birth. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing pessary placement with expectant management (control) in girls and women who were pregnant with singletons (singleton pregnancies) and who had a cervical length of 25 mm or less at 20 weeks 0 days to 24 weeks 6 days of gestation. Participants in either group who had a cervical length of 15 mm or less, at randomization or at subsequent visits, received treatment with vaginal progesterone. The primary outcome was spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. RESULTS In an intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference between the pessary group (465 participants) and the control group (467 participants) in the rate of spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks (12.0% and 10.8%, respectively; odds ratio in the pessary group, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.69; P = 0.57). There were no significant differences in the rates of perinatal death (3.2% in the pessary group and 2.4% in the control group, P = 0.42), adverse neonatal outcome (6.7% and 5.7%, respectively; P = 0.55), or neonatal special care (11.6% and 12.9%, respectively; P = 0.59). The incidence of new or increased vaginal discharge was significantly higher in the pessary group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Among girls and women with singleton pregnancies who had a short cervix, a cervical pessary did not result in a lower rate of spontaneous early preterm delivery than the rate with expectant management.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFetal Medicine Foundationen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherMASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOCen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectCerclageen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectDeliveryen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMortalityen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRisken_US
Keywordsdc.subjectLengthen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectWomenen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectDouble-blinden_US
Keywordsdc.subjectVaginal progesteroneen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectPlacebo-controlled trialen_US
Títulodc.titleA Randomized Trial of a Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Singleton Birthen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile