Sex determination using the mesio-distal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines in a modern Chilean population
Author
dc.contributor.author
Peckmann, Tanya R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Logar, Ciara
Author
dc.contributor.author
Garrido Varas, Claudia E.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Meek, Susan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Toledo Pinto, Ximena
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-07-07T21:22:38Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-07-07T21:22:38Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Science and Justice 56 (2016) 84–89
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.10.002
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/139482
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The pelvis and skull have been shown to be the most accurate skeletal elements for the determination of sex. Incomplete or fragmentary bones are frequently found at forensic sites however teeth are often recovered in forensic cases due to their postmortem longevity. The goal of the present research was to investigate sexual dimorphism between the mesio-distal dimension of the permanent maxillary incisors and canines for the determination of sex in a contemporary Chilean population. Three hundred and three dental models (126 males and 177 females) from individuals ranging in age from 13 years to 37 years old were used from the School of Dentistry, University of Chile. The statistical analyses showed that only the central incisors and canines were sexually dimorphic. Discriminant function score equations were generated for use in sex determination. The average accuracy of sex classification ranged from 59.7% to 65.0% for the univariate analysis and 60.1% to 66.7% for the multivariate analysis. Comparisons to other populations were made. Overall, the accuracies ranged from 54.4% to 63.3% with males most often identified correctly and females most often misidentified. The determination of sex from the mesio-distal width of incisors and canines in Chilean populations does not adhere to the Mohan and Daubert criteria and therefore would not be presented as evidence in court.