Chile: Acceptability of a Training Program for Depression Management in Primary Care
Author
dc.contributor.author
Marín Catalán, Rigoberto
Author
dc.contributor.author
Martínez, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cornejo Diez de Medina, Juan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Díaz Vargas, Berta
Author
dc.contributor.author
Peralta, José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tala Tajmuch, Álvaro
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rojas Castillo, María Graciela
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-11-21T19:35:27Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-11-21T19:35:27Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Frontiers in Psychology June 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 853
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00853
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141301
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: In Chile, there are inconsistencies in the management of depression in primary care settings, and the National Depression Program, currently in effect, was implemented without a standardized training program. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of a training program on the management of depression for primary care health teams.
Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial, and two primary centers from the Metropolitan Region of Santiago were randomly selected to carry out the intervention training program. Pre-post surveys were applied, to evaluate expectations and satisfaction with the intervention, respectively. Descriptive and content analysis was carried out.
Result: The sample consisted of 41 health professionals, 56.1% of who reported that their expectations for the intervention were met. All of the training activities were evaluated with scores higher than 6.4 (on a 1-7 scale). The trainers, the methodology, and the learning environment were considered strengths and facilitators of the program, while the limited duration of the training, the logistical problems faced during part of the program, and the lack of educational material were viewed as weaknesses.
Conclusion: The intervention was well accepted by primary health care teams. However, the clinical impact in patients still has to be evaluated.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Chilean National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT)
1130230