Leader Cells Define Directionality of Trunk, but Not Cranial, Neural Crest Cell Migration
Author
dc.contributor.author
Richardson, Jo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gauert, Anton
Author
dc.contributor.author
Briones Montecinos, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kabla, Alexandre
Author
dc.contributor.author
Härtel, Steffen
Author
dc.contributor.author
Linker, Claudia
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-11-22T19:19:32Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-11-22T19:19:32Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Cell Reports 15, 2076–2088, May 31, 2016
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.067
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141335
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Collective cell migration is fundamental for life and a hallmark of cancer. Neural crest (NC) cells migrate collectively, but the mechanisms governing this process remain controversial. Previous analyses in Xenopus indicate that cranial NC (CNC) cells are a homogeneous population relying on cell-cell interactions for directional migration, while chick embryo analyses suggest a heterogeneous population with leader cells instructing directionality. Our data in chick and zebrafish embryos show that CNC cells do not require leader cells for migration and all cells present similar migratory capacities. In contrast, laser ablation of trunk NC (TNC) cells shows that leader cells direct movement and cell-cell contacts are required for migration. Moreover, leader and follower identities are acquired before the initiation of migration and remain fixed thereafter. Thus, two distinct mechanisms establish the directionality of CNC cells and TNC cells. This implies the existence of multiple molecular mechanisms for collective cell migration.