Associations of Blood Pressure With Geographical Latitude, Solar Radiation, and Ambient Temperature: Results From the Chilean Health Survey, 2009-2010
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cabrera, Sebastian E.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mindell, Jennifer S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Toledo, Mario
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alvo Abodovsky, Miriam
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ferro, Charles J.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-12-13T19:52:58Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-12-13T19:52:58Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
American Journal of Epidemiology. Volumen: 183 Número: 11 Páginas: 1071-1073
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1093/aje/kww037
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141853
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Mean blood pressure and the prevalence of hypertension
vary widely throughout the world (1). Geographical latitude
has been cited as a possible explanation for this variance (2–
5), with increasing distance from the equator being associated
with higher blood pressures. However, these statements are
often not referenced (3) or refer to data from a post-hoc analysis
of the International Study of Sodium, Potassium, and
Blood Pressure (INTERSALT) (2, 4), which was published
as a hypothesis paper in which the authors did not adequately
report the methodology so as to allow others to assess the
validity of the results (6). In other studies in which similar findings
were reported, the differences observed were either explained
by factors such as salt intake (7) or were confounded
by other significant differences in characteristics such as renal
function, diabetes prevalence, lifestyle, and diet (8–12). Ambient
temperature and number of daylight hours have also been
reported to affect blood pressure and the prevalence of hypertension
(13–15).