Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Autordc.contributor.authorGaete, Jorge 
Autordc.contributor.authorMartínez Nahuel, Vania 
Autordc.contributor.authorFritsch Montero, Rosemarie 
Autordc.contributor.authorRojas Castillo, María Graciela 
Autordc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Alan A. 
Autordc.contributor.authorAraya, Ricardo 
Fecha ingresodc.date.accessioned2017-01-04T20:29:56Z
Fecha disponibledc.date.available2017-01-04T20:29:56Z
Fecha de publicacióndc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry. Volumen: 16 Número de artículo: 276es_ES
Identificadordc.identifier.other10.1186/s12888-016-0985-4
Identificadordc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/142264
Resumendc.description.abstractBackground: Depression is a disabling condition affecting people of all ages, but generally starting during adolescence. Schools seem to be an excellent setting where preventive interventions may be delivered. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of an indicated school-based intervention to reduce depressive symptoms among at-risk adolescents from low-income families. Methods: A two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 11 secondary schools in vulnerable socioeconomic areas in Santiago, Chile. High-risk students in year 10 (2 degrees Medio) were invited to a baseline assessment (n = 1048). Those who scored = 10 (boys) and = 15 (girls) in the BDI-II were invited to the trial (n = 376). A total of 342 students consented and were randomly allocated into an intervention or a control arm in a ratio of 2:1. The intervention consisted of 8 group sessions of 45 min each, based on cognitive-behavioural models and delivered by two trained psychologists in the schools. Primary (BDI-II) and secondary outcomes (measures of anxiety, automatic thoughts and problem-solving skills) were administered before and at 3 months post intervention. The primary outcome was the recovery rate, defined as the proportion of participants who scored in the BDI-II < 10 (among boys) and < 15 (among girls) at 3 months after completing the intervention. Results: There were 229 participants in the intervention group and 113 in the control group. At 3-month follow-up 81.4 % in the intervention and 81.7 % in the control group provided outcome data. The recovery rate was 10 % higher in the intervention (50.3 %) than in the control (40.2 %) group; with an adjusted OR = 1.62 (95 % CI: 0.95 to 2.77) (p = 0.08). No difference between groups was found in any of the secondary outcomes. Secondary analyses revealed an interaction between group and baseline BDI-II score. Conclusions: We found no clear evidence of the effectiveness of a brief, indicated school-based intervention based on cognitive-behavioural models on reducing depressive symptoms among Chilean adolescents from low-income families. More research is needed in order to find better solutions to prevent depression among adolescents.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trustes_ES
Idiomadc.language.isoenes_ES
Publicadordc.publisherBIOMED Centrales_ES
Tipo de licenciadc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link a Licenciadc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Fuentedc.sourceBMC Psychiatryes_ES
Palabras clavesdc.subjectPreventiones_ES
Palabras clavesdc.subjectAdolescentses_ES
Palabras clavesdc.subjectDepressiones_ES
Palabras clavesdc.subjectIndicated-school based interventiones_ES
Títulodc.titleIndicated school-based intervention to improve depressive symptoms among at risk Chilean adolescents: a randomized controlled triales_ES
Tipo de documentodc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogadoruchile.catalogadorC. R. B.es_ES
Indizaciónuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Descargar archivo

Icon

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Excepto que se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile