Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorLopes, Letícia de Souza 
Authordc.contributor.authorSignorelli Calazans, Fernanda 
Authordc.contributor.authorHidalgo, Ricardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorBuitrago, Letícia 
Authordc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Reyes, Mario 
Authordc.contributor.authorReis, Alessandra 
Authordc.contributor.authorDourado Loguercio, Alessandro 
Authordc.contributor.authorOliveira Barceleiro, Marcos de 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2017-11-03T17:32:24Z
Available datedc.date.available2017-11-03T17:32:24Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016-09
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, 2016, 41-5, 465-480es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.2341/15-309-C
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/145453
Abstractdc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the six-month clinical performance of a new universal adhesive (Xeno Select, Dentsply) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria: World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS). Methods and Materials: A total of 124 restorations were randomly placed in 31 patients according to the following groups: ER-D = etch-and-rinse/dry dentin; ER-M = etch-and-rinse/moist dentin; SE-et = selective enamel etching; and SET = self-etch. The composite resin EVOLUX ( Dentsply) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated after one week (baseline) and at six months using the FDI and USPHS criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests (alpha = 0.05). Results: Fifteen restorations were lost or fractured at six months (one for ER-D, three for ER-M, five for SE-et, and six for SET) (p > 0.05 at six-month recall). When ER (ER-D and ER-M) was compared with SE (SE- et and SET) there was a significant difference in the retention rate after six months (p = 0.001). Marginal staining and postoperative sensitivity to air were only observed in three (one for ER-M and two for SET) and two restorations (two for ER-D) in both evaluation criteria (p > 0.05), respectively. Forty-seven restorations were considered to have minor discrepancies in marginal adaptation at the six-month recall using the FDI criteria (13 for ER-D, 10 for ER-M, 11 for SE-et, and 13 for SET; p > 0.05 between groups). However, for all groups, a significant difference was detected when baseline and six-month data were compared (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The six-month clinical behavior of Xeno Select Universal Adhesive depends on the bonding strategy used. The universal adhesive did not fulfill the American Dental Association criteria for full approval when used in the self-etch mode.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipThis study was partially supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) under grants 304104/2013-9 and 301891/2010-9.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherOperative Dentistryes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceOperative Dentistryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEtch-and-rinsees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSelf-etches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBonding effectivenesses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHard tissueses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDentines_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLesionses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEnameles_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectResines_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPerformancees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHydroxyapatitees_ES
Títulodc.titleSix-month Follow-up of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: A Randomized Clinical Triales_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorffces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile