Maternal biomarkers of methylation status and non-syndromic orofacial cleft risk: a meta-analysis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Blanco Castillo, Rafael
Author
dc.contributor.author
Colombo Flores, Alicia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pardo Vargas, Rosa
Author
dc.contributor.author
Suazo Sanhueza, José Lorenzo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2017-12-21T14:01:58Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2017-12-21T14:01:58Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016; 45: 1323–1332
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0901-5027
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.ijom.2016.06.011
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146251
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Animal models have shown evidence of the role of maternal methyl donor status and its metabolism (one-carbon metabolism) in normal embryonic maxillofacial development. Nevertheless, studies in humans have shown conflicting results for the association of maternal methylation status biomarkers in the aetiology of the main craniofacial birth defects: non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFCs). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis assessing the relationship between maternal levels of methylation status biomarkers (plasma and erythrocyte folates and plasma vitamin B12 and homocysteine) and the risk of NSOFCs. A literature search of the conventional and grey medical scientific databases identified 12 studies considering these variables. Based on standardized differences between means among cases and controls (Cohen's d test), evidence was found of an association only with high plasma homocysteine (d = 0.37; P = 0.026) when single effects were pooled. In addition to its usefulness as a marker of poor methyl donor intake and/or metabolism, homocysteine appears to have a teratogenic effect. Although the results are based on a relatively small number of reports and/or studies of small sample sizes showing between-study heterogeneity, these problems were resolved by including an additional analysis. Therefore these findings constitute a real contribution towards explaining the complex aetiology of orofacial clefts