Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorVoehringer, P. A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBarroilhet Diez, Sergio 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlvear, K. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMedina, S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorEspinosa, C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlexandrovich, K. 
Authordc.contributor.authorRiumallo, P. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLeiva, F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorHurtado, M. E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorCabrera, J. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSullivan, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorHoltzman, N. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGhaemi, S. N. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2017-12-28T14:26:31Z
Available datedc.date.available2017-12-28T14:26:31Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationActa Psychiatr Scand 2016: 134: 504–510es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1111/acps.12643
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146339
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjectiveThe differential diagnosis of bipolar illness vs. borderline personality is controversial. Both conditions manifest impulsive behavior, unstable interpersonal relationships, and mood symptoms. This study examines whether and which mood clinical features can differentiate between both conditions. MethodA total of 260 patients (mean standard deviation age 41 13 years, 68% female) attending to a mood clinic were examined for diagnosis of bipolar illness and borderline personality disorder using SCID-I, SCID-II, and clinical mood criteria extracted from Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). They were analyzed using diagnoses as dependent variables. Predictors of bipolar and borderline diagnoses were identified by multivariable logistic regressions, and predictive validity of models was assessed using ROC curve analysis. ResultsBipolar illness was strongly predicted by elevated mood (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.80-9.15), increased goal-directed activities (OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.73-8.96), and episodicity of mood symptoms (OR = 3.48, 95% CI 1.49-8.39). This triad model predicted bipolar illness with 88.7% sensitivity, 81.4% specificity, and obtained an auROC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96) and a positive predictive value of 85.1%. For borderline personality disorder, only female gender was a statistically significant predictor (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.29-13.7), and the predictive model obtained an auROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.53-0.74). ConclusionIn a mood disorder clinic setting, manic criteria and episodic mood course distinguished bipolar illness from borderline personality disorder.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWiley-Blackwelles_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Keywordsdc.subjectBipolar illnesses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDifferential diagnosises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBorderline personality disorderes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMisdiagnosises_ES
Títulodc.titleThe International Mood Network (IMN) Nosology Project: differentiating borderline personality from bipolar illnesses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile