Monitoring and evaluating capacity building activities in low and middle income countries: challenges and opportunities
Author
dc.contributor.author
Schneider, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Water, T. van de
Author
dc.contributor.author
Araya, R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bonini, B. B.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pilowsky, D. J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pratt, C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Price, L.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rojas, G.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Seedat, S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sharma, M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Susser, E.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-01-15T17:47:37Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-01-15T17:47:37Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Global Mental Health (2016), 3, e29, page 1 of 15. doi:10.1017/gmh.2016.24
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1017/gmh.2016.24
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146483
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background Lower and middle income countries (LMICs) are home to > 80% of the global population, but mental health researchers and LMIC investigator led publications are concentrated in 10% of LMICs. Increasing research and research outputs, such as in the form of peer reviewed publications, require increased capacity building (CB) opportunities in LMICs. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) initiative, Collaborative Hubs for International Research on Mental Health reaches across five regional 'hubs' established in LMICs, to provide training and support for emerging researchers through hub-specific CB activities. This paper describes the range of CB activities, the process of monitoring, and the early outcomes of CB activities conducted by the five research hubs.
Methods The indicators used to describe the nature, the monitoring, and the early outcomes of CB activities were developed collectively by the members of an inter-hub CB workgroup representing all five hubs. These indicators included but were not limited to courses, publications, and grants.
Results Results for all indicators demonstrate a wide range of feasible CB activities. The five hubs were successful in providing at least one and the majority several courses; 13 CB recipient-led articles were accepted for publication; and nine grant applications were successful.
Conclusions The hubs were successful in providing CB recipients with a wide range of CB activities. The challenge remains to ensure ongoing CB of mental health researchers in LMICs, and in particular, to sustain the CB efforts of the five hubs after the termination of NIMH funding.