A decade lost and found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bergoeing Vela, Raphael
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kehoe, Patrick J
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kehoe, Timothy J
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soto, Raimundo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-01-15T17:51:24Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-01-15T17:51:24Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2002
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Review of Economic Dynamics Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 166 - 205, Enero, 2002
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
1094-2025
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.2001.0150
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146493
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Chile and Mexico experienced severe economic crises in the early 1980s. This paper analyzes four possible explanations for why Chile recovered much faster than Mexico did. Comparing data from the two countries allows us to rule out a monetarist explanation, an explanation based on falls in real wages and real exchange rates, and a debt overhang explanation. Using growth accounting, a calibrated growth model, and economic theory, we conclude that the crucial difference between the two countries was the earlier policy reforms in Chile that generated faster productivity growth. The most crucial of these reforms were in banking and bankruptcy procedures