Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAcuña, Rafael 
Authordc.contributor.authorFliesswasser, Stella 
Authordc.contributor.authorAckermann, Markus 
Authordc.contributor.authorHenning, Tilo 
Authordc.contributor.authorLuebert Bruron, Federico José 
Authordc.contributor.authorWeigend, Maximilian 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T19:16:22Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-03-23T19:16:22Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017-04
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationTaxon (2017) Volumen: 66 Número: 2 Páginas: 365-378es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.12705/662.5
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/146979
Abstractdc.description.abstractLoasaceae, a mostly American group, is one of the largest families of Cornales. In spite of considerable progress over the last 20 years, the relationships of some clades remain controversial, especially in the "South Andean Loasas" (SAL-Blumenbachia, Caiophora, Loasa, Scyphanthus). The present study addresses the phylogenetic relationships in SAL employing four plastid markers (rps16, trnL-trnF, trnS-trnG, matK) and ITS and aims at resolving the systematics and evolution of the group. Sequences obtained from a total of 59 SAL species (ca. 70% of the total, representing all lineages in the group) and 25 outgroup taxa were analysed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference approaches. ML best and BI strict consensus trees showed no significant differences in their topologies. Our results confirm that two species of Loasa ser. Malesherbioideae are not part of the SAL clade, but should be included in Presliophytum, a result which is here formalized. Blumenbachia (including sect. Angulatae and sect. Gripidea) is confirmed as a monophylum with high support. Loasa has to be redefined and restricted to a clade including only ser. Deserticolae, ser. Floribundae, ser. Loasa and ser. Macrospermae. Scyphanthus and Caiophora both are each monophyla and sister groups, but with two clades of Loasa as successive sister groups: (((Caiophora+Scyphanthus) +Loasa ser. Pinnatae)+(L. ser. Volubiles+L. ser. Acaules)) in a very well-supported clade. Accordingly, Caiophora, Loasa ser. Pinnatae, L. ser. Volubiles, L. ser. Acaules and Scyphanthus could be included into a single genus, with Scyphanthus taking priority over Caiophora, creating a fairly heterogenous genus of ca. 52 species and requiring 50 new names. Alternatively, the clades Loasa ser. Pinnatae and L. ser. Volubiles+ser. Acaules can be removed into new segregate genera, which is here argued for and which requires the creation of only 16 new names. The new genus names and some of the new combinations are here formalized.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipALECOSTA Universidad de Costa Rica DAADes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherInt Assoc Plant Taxonomyes_ES
Sourcedc.sourceTaxones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBlumenbachiaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCaiophoraes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMorphologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLoasaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPlastid markerses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectScyphanthuses_ES
Títulodc.titlePhylogenetic relationships and generic re-arrangements in "South Andean Loasas" (Loasaceae)es_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatoses_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorpgves_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record