Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMillacura, Natalia 
Authordc.contributor.authorPardo Vargas, Rosa 
Authordc.contributor.authorCifuentes Ovalle, Lucía 
Authordc.contributor.authorSuazo Sanhueza, José Lorenzo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T22:01:33Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-05-29T22:01:33Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPublic Health Nutrition Vol. 20 (12): 2260-2268es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1017/S1368980017000878
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/148319
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: Orofacial clefts (OFC) are the most prevalent craniofacial birth defect. Folic acid (FA) supplementation has been demonstrated as an effective intervention to reduce risk of OFC occurrence. However, the effect of mandatory FA fortification of wheat and/or maize flour on OFC prevalence has shown controversial results among countries adopting this policy. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to synthesize the available evidence evaluating the global impact of this mandatory policy on OFC occurrence. Design: Literature search in conventional and grey medical/scientific databases showed fifteen studies considering OFC prevalence in pre- and post-fortification periods with FA. The effect of this policy was evaluated by computing relative risk (RR) and separating samples into total OFC, non-syndromic forms, cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate only (CPO). Results: We found a significant effect of FA fortification only on non-syndromic CL/P (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.81, 0.96), whereas neutral effects were detected for total OFC (syndromic plus non-syndromic) and CPO. Conclusions: Our results may reflect the different aetiology of syndromic OFC with respect to non-syndromic forms and the CL/P related to CPO. Although the number of non-syndromic CL/P samples was lower than that for total OFC, the absence of both between-study heterogeneity and publication bias leads us to conclude that FA fortification may have beneficial effects on non-syndromic CL/P.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherCambridge University Presses_ES
Sourcedc.sourcePublic Health Nutritiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOrofacial cleftses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFolic acid fortificationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMeta analysises_ES
Títulodc.titleEffects of folic acid fortification on orofacial clefts prevalence: a meta-analysises_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatoses_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record