Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPenna Varela, Mario 
Authordc.contributor.authorCisternas, Javiera 
Authordc.contributor.authorToloza, Jessica 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-06-26T14:37:54Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-06-26T14:37:54Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEthology, 2017; 123: 748–760es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1111/eth.12644
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149229
Abstractdc.description.abstractAnimals adopt different strategies to communicate by means of sound in noisy environments such that some species increase, while others decrease their vocal activity in the presence of interference. Anuran amphibians from diverse latitudes exhibit both kinds of responses. Recent studies have shown that males of Batrachyla taeniata and Batrachyla antartandica from the temperate austral forest do not call in response to the presentation of advertisement calls of sympatric congeneric species. In contrast, Batrachyla leptopus responds to these signals in a similar way as to conspecific calls. The responsiveness of B.taeniata to natural abiotic interference has also been tested and found that noises of such sources produce strong increases in vocal activity. To assess the diversity in responsiveness to acoustic intrusion in this group, we exposed males of B.leptopus and B.antartandica to prolonged pre-recorded natural abiotic noises of wind, creek, rain, and to a band-pass noise centered at 2,000Hz, at 67dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL). The subjects did not increase their vocal activity significantly when exposed to these sounds and to band-pass noise at increasing intensities (55-79dB SPL). These results contrast with the increase in vocal activity observed previously in B.taeniata to continuous abiotic noise and point to the existence of diverse strategies to confront acoustic intrusion among related species. The lack of vocal activation observed also contrasts with the responsiveness of B.leptopus to heterospecific signals, but parallels the lack of response to such sounds in B.antartandica. Furthermore, the results obtained contrast with the responsiveness of these species to synthetic prolonged sounds observed in previous studies, suggesting that the modes of responses to acoustic intrusion may depend on previous experience, rather than having a species-specific nature.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFONDECYT 1140014es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWileyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceEthologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAbiotic noisees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAcoustic interferencees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAnuranses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAustral temperate forestes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSound communicationes_ES
Títulodc.titleRestricted responsiveness to noise interference in two anurans from the southern temperate forestes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile