Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCruz Montecinos, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorFuente, C. de la 
Authordc.contributor.authorRivera Lillo, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMorales Castillo, S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSoto Arellano, V. 
Authordc.contributor.authorQuerol, F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPérez Alenda, S. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T21:18:33Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-06-27T21:18:33Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationHaemophilia. 2017;23: e419–e426es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1111/hae.13297
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149311
Abstractdc.description.abstractIntroduction: The sensory strategies of postural control in adult haemophilic arthropathy patients are still poorly understood. Aim: To determine sensorial posture-control strategies through postural sway frequency analysis when in a bipedal quiet stance with and without visual stimulus deprivation in healthy subjects and patients with haemophilic arthropathy. Secondarily, to determine the irregularity of postural balance control through sample entropy (SampEn). Methods: A triaxial accelerometer attached at the L3 level determined the displacement and acceleration of the centre of mass (DCoM and ACoM, respectively) under open-and closed-eyes conditions. Sensorial strategies were studied by spectral analysis of the DCoM signal, divided into low, medium and high frequencies for visual/vestibular, cerebellum and somatosensory strategies respectively. DCoM irregularity was also analysed by SampEn. Results: Fifteen young, healthy subjects and fifteen young, haemophilia patients were included. The mediolateal DCoM and anteroposterior ACoM differed between groups. During the open-eyes condition, haemophiliacs presented limited high and medium frequencies, and more low frequency bands as compared to non-haemophiliacs (P<. 05). In the closed-eyes condition, haemophiliacs had a minor percentage of high frequencies but an elevated percentage of low frequencies as compared to non-haemophiliacs (P<. 05). Non-haemophiliacs had higher SampEn than haemophiliacs in the mediolateral axis with open-and closed-eyes (P<. 05 and <. 001, respectively). Conclusions: The presented results indicate that patients with haemophilic arthropathy, as compared to healthy subjects, have less postural control irregularity and poor somatosensory system contributions that are compensated by more vestibular inputs.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWileyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceHaemophiliaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCentre of masses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHaemophiliaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHaemophilic arthropathyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPostural controles_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSample entropyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSomatosensoryes_ES
Títulodc.titleSensory strategies of postural sway during quiet stance in patients with haemophilic arthropathyes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile