Bidding the project vs. bidding the envelope in public sector infrastructure procurements
Author
dc.contributor.author
Basso Sotz, Leonardo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ross, Thomas W.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-07-17T17:13:09Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-07-17T17:13:09Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Transport Policy, 64 (2018): 61–75
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.004
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149949
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
We study the relative efficiency of two mechanisms actually employed in large-scale public procurements, often
for transportation projects such as roads, bridges and rapid transit systems. In the more common “bidding the
project” mechanism, the government specifies the size of the project (a quantity) and firms bid prices (the lowest
bid winning). In the “bidding the envelope” mechanism the government specifies what it is willing to spend and
firms bid quantities (the highest winning). With uncertainty about project costs and benefits, the much less
frequently applied “bidding the envelope” mechanism can lead to higher value for money. Its advantage lies in its
ability to allow quantity to adjust to high or low costs.