Performance measures in tax administration: Chile as a case study
Author
dc.contributor.author
Serra Banfi, Pablo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-07-30T21:28:18Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-07-30T21:28:18Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2005
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Public Administration and Development 25(2): 115-124 2005
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0271-2075
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1002/pad.356
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150461
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The article proposes a set of tax administration performance measures and contrasts them with measures actually used by the
Chilean tax administration agency. The goals assumed for the tax administration agency (TA) are to maximize tax revenue
collection and provide quality services to taxpayers. Ideal performance measures (PMs) would measure the deviation of actual
outcome from a best-practice standard, given the value of all variables affecting organisation performance that are outside management
control. The key challenge is to build and calculate these best-practice outcomes. In Chile the PM in use, for the first
goal, is the ratio of actual to potential tax revenue collection. This PM does adjust revenue collection for variations in the tax
structure and rate, but it fails to control other variables that affect performance such as the TA budget and per capita income. The
PM in use, for the second goal, is taxpayer satisfaction measured through sample surveys. This seems the appropriate PM, as
quality of taxpayer services depends directly on the TA efforts to improve them. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd