Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSlachevsky Chonchol, Andrea 
Authordc.contributor.authorBarraza, Paulo 
Authordc.contributor.authorHornberger, Michael 
Authordc.contributor.authorMuñoz Neira, Carlos 
Authordc.contributor.authorFlanagan, Emma 
Authordc.contributor.authorHenríquez, F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBravo, Eduardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorFarías, Mauricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorDelgado, Carolina 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T15:40:26Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-07-31T15:40:26Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Alzheimers Disease Volumen: 61 Número: 2 Páginas: 589-600es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3233/JAD-160973
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150489
Abstractdc.description.abstractEpisodic memory tests with cued recall, such as the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), allow for the delineation of hippocampal and prefrontal atrophy contributions to memory performance in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Both Word and Picture versions of the test exist but show different profiles, with the Picture version usually scoring higher across different cohorts. One possible explanation for this divergent performance between the different modality versions of the test might be that they rely on different sets of neural correlates. The current study explores this by contrasting the neural correlates of the Word and Picture versions of the FCSRT with voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in AD and healthy subjects. We predicted that the Picture version would be associated with different cortical regions than the Word version, which might be more hippocampal-centric. When comparing 35 AD patients and 34 controls, AD patients exhibited impairments on both versions of the FCSRT and both groups performed higher in the Picture version. A region of interest analysis based on prior work revealed significant correlations between free recall of either version with atrophy of the temporal pole and hippocampal regions. Thus, contrary to expectations, performance on both the Word and the Picture version of the FCSRT is associated with largely overlapping networks. Free recall is associated with hippocampal volume and might be properly considered as an indicator of hippocampal structural integrity.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFONDAP 15150012 PIA-CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 CONICYT/FONDECYT/1140423es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherIOS Presses_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Alzheimers Diseasees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAlzheimer's diseasees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBiomarkerses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEpisodic memoryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFCSRT Picture versiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFCSRT Word versiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFree and cued selective reminding testes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHippocampuses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectVoxel based morphometryes_ES
Títulodc.titleNeuroanatomical comparison of the "Word" and "Picture" versions of the free and cued selective reminding test in alzheimer's diseasees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile