Adquirir habilidades no manejo de crises de hipertermia maligna: comparacao de simulacao de alta-fidelidade versus estudo de caso em computador
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mejía Díaz, Vilma
Author
dc.contributor.author
González, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Delfino, Alejandro
Author
dc.contributor.author
Altermatt, Fernando
Author
dc.contributor.author
Corvetto, Marcia
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-08-09T20:31:52Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-08-09T20:31:52Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2018; 68(3):292-298
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0034-7094
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1016/j.bjan.2018.01.005
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150836
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effect of high fidelity simulation versus a computer-based case solving self-study, in skills acquisition about malignant hyperthermia on first year anesthesiology residents.
Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval, 31 first year anesthesiology residents were enrolled in this prospective randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to either a High Fidelity Simulation Scenario or a computer-based Case Study about malignant hyperthermia. After the intervention, all subjects' performance in was assessed through a high fidelity simulation scenario using a previously validated assessment rubric. Additionally, knowledge tests and a satisfaction survey were applied. Finally, a semi-structured interview was done to assess self-perception of reasoning process and decision-making.
Results: 28 first year residents finished successfully the study. Resident's management skill scores were globally higher in High Fidelity Simulation versus Case Study, however they were significant in 4 of the 8 performance rubric elements: recognize signs and symptoms (p = 0.025), prioritization of initial actions of management (p = 0.003), recognize complications (p = 0.025) and communication (p = 0.025). Average scores from pre- and post test knowledge questionnaires improved from 74% to 85% in the High Fidelity Simulation group, and decreased from 78% to 75% in the Case Study group (p = 0.032). Regarding the qualitative analysis, there was no difference in factors influencing the student's process of reasoning and decision-making with both teaching strategies.
Conclusion: Simulation-based training with a malignant hyperthermia high-fidelity scenario was superior to computer-based case study, improving knowledge and skills in malignant hyperthermia crisis management, with a very good satisfaction level in anesthesia residents. (C) 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license