Policy-Driven Productivity in Chile and Mexico in the 1980’s and 1990’s
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bergoeing Vela, Raphael
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kehoe, Patrick J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kehoe, Timothy J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soto, Raimundo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-08-10T17:33:32Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-08-10T17:33:32Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2002
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
American Economic Review VOL. 92, NO. 2, MAY 2002 (pp. 16-21)
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0002-8282
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1257/000282802320188925
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150846
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Both Chile and Mexico experienced severe economic crises in the early 1980s, but Chile recovered much faster than did Mexico. Using growth accounting and a calibrated dynamic general equilibrium model, we conclude that the crucial determinant of this difference between the two countries was the faster productivity growth in Chile, rather than higher investment or employment. Our hypothesis is that this difference in productivity was driven by ealier policy reforms in Chile, the most crucial of which were in banking and bankruptcy procedures. We propose a theoretical framework in which government policy affects both the allocation of resources and the composition of firms.