Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorEstay Larenas, Juan 
Authordc.contributor.authorCasielles, Javier Martin 
Authordc.contributor.authorVildósola Grez, Patricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorVillablanca Martínez, Claudia Alejandra 
Authordc.contributor.authorMjor, Ivar A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorOliveira, Osmir Batista 
Authordc.contributor.authorLaske, Mark 
Authordc.contributor.authorLoomans, Bas A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFerrarezi de Andrade, Marcelo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMoncada Cortés, Gustavo 
Authordc.contributor.authorGordan, Valeria V. 
Authordc.contributor.authorOpdam, Niek J. M 
Authordc.contributor.authorFernández Godoy, Eduardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T19:42:30Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-08-28T19:42:30Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Dentistry Volumen: 31 Número: 2 Páginas: 107-112es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0894-8275
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151340
Abstractdc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate sealed amalgam and resin-based composite restorations after 12 years to determine whether sealing minor defects (micro-repairs) enhanced the longevity of restorations. Methods: 34 subjects aged 18-80 were recruited. This sample group underwent 137 restorations, including 51 resin-based composite (RC) and 86 amalgam (AM) restorations. Existing restorations with localized, marginal defects were assigned to one of two groups: (a) the Sealing group (n=48, 27 AM; 21 RC) or (b) the Control group (n=89, 59 AM; 30 RC). The quality of each restoration was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria by two examiners at the beginning of the study and after 1-5, 10, and 12 years. Kaplan Meier survival curves were created and a Cox regression was applied to investigate survival variables. Mantel Cox, Wilcoxon, and Friedman tests were performed for comparisons within groups. Results: After 12 years, no statistically significant differences were observed for the variables "restorative material" (P=0.538) or "sealing yes/no" (P=0.136) with respect to the longevity of the restorations. All groups behaved similarly with regard to marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and tooth sensitivity (P >= 0.05). Cumulatively, after a 12-year observation period, sealing minor restoration defects did not affect the longevity of the restorations.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFondecyt 1170575es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherMosher & Linderes_ES
Sourcedc.sourceAmerican Journal of Dentistryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPosterior composite restorationses_ES
Keywordsdc.subject10-year clinical-triales_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectNational dental pbrnes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSecondary carieses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAmalgam restorationses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGap sizees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRepaires_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSealantses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCriteriaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectReplacementes_ES
Títulodc.titleSealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevityes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso a solo metadatoses_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record